Tag: leaving Canada

·

Markets opened yesterday with a pretty much wait-and-see attitude to the goings on in the Middle East. For the time being, the markets seem to have shrugged off the increase in oil prices. The IMF has issued a warning about inflation and slowing global economic growth. I never see anyone back-check these guys to see if any of their forecasts ever pan out. I won’t bother doing so as it’s a waste of time.

I continue to struggle with implementing a plan for my portfolio to allow me to emigrate from Canada. I hit one roadblock after another. I ran into an issue with U.S. estate taxes. Yes, US estate taxes. It seems that whatever you do, there is some US rule or regulation that can affect you, no matter where you live. I fail to understand how this is possible, but most countries have given in to the extra-territorial application of US law. Something countries used to resist in the past, but here we are.

“Canadians with US situs assets (real estate, US stocks) exceeding USD$60,000 and a worldwide estate over USD$15M (2026) may face U.S. estate taxes. Scotia Wealth Management notes that while treaty exemptions offer relief, Filing Form 706-NA is required if U.S. assets exceed $60K. Proper planning is vital due to graduated rates up to 40%.”

My understanding is that to claim the exemption under the US-Canada Tax Treaty, you need to file the form. I don’t give tax advice, but I will check out what the implications are for me. Yet another thing to wreck your retirement planning that no one tells you about. Especially for those Canadians who would like to emigrate. It never stops. As long as I have an RRSP or RRIF, I will be unsure about everything and anything, it seems. With a never-ending host of issues/problems to address.

·

For those of you looking to retire outside of Canada, there is an important issue/matter that you need to be aware of. I may have mentioned it in an earlier post, but it needs to be mentioned again.

Canadian financial institutions generally look to profitability when it comes to decisions about lines of business. The same applies to providing investment products to non-residents, whether they originate from Canada or not. If you are a Canadian resident and citizen, and you decide to emigrate, you will find the environment pretty hostile to your contemplated move. In 2021, TD Bank advised many, if not most, of their TD Direct Investing clients that their accounts would be closed. Clients were given 30 days, or their holdings would be liquidated. This becomes particularly problematic if you have a RRIF or a LIF. This would result in a pretty substantial tax hit in some circumstances. Before moving, you must investigate what will happen. After you leave, your options will be limited, if you have any options. There are a lot of rules and regulations for the opening of securities trading accounts for non-residents. And many, if not most, Canadian financial institutions don’t care about offloading a whole bunch of accounts once they decide to do so.

There are no easy answers here. You ned to plan for the worst and hope for the best. This is not an issue created by the Canada Revenue Agency. It’s internal bank compliance that drives this, and the cost of managing these accounts.

BE CAREFUL!

·

Another aspect of registered savings plans in Canada (RRSPs, RRIFs and others), is their portability. What I am referring to here is what happens to these plans in the case where you might want to retire in a country other than Canada.

I have been researching the subject, and a couple of things have come up. First, it’s very difficult to get a clear answer on what happens when you emigrate from Canada. It seems that policies differ from bank to bank, perhaps to a great extent or maybe with minor differences.

What is clear is that in some cases, you will lose access to your portfolio online. What that means is that you will need to actually call in to do a foreign exchange transaction or move funds from your registered plans to your bank account.

As I mentioned above, your account may be coded sell only. So that means that your portfolio is frozen in time, and you cannot make any adjustments to your portfolio other than a sale. If you want to replace one stock with another, you cannot do so. You can only liquidate into cash. It makes traditional portfolio management impossible.

I did a search using AI on how one might manage a portfolio in this situation. It came up with this:

ETFs are generally a better choice than individual stocks for a portfolio that can only be liquidated and not replenished with new purchases, primarily due to diversification benefits and lower single-stock risk.

Why ETFs are Generally Better

Instant Diversification: An ETF is a basket of many underlying securities (often dozens or hundreds). This structure immediately diversifies your holdings across different companies and potentially sectors, which significantly reduces the impact of a poor performance from any single company within the fund.
Reduced Single-Stock Risk: Individual stocks carry idiosyncratic risk (risk specific to that single company), such as a product failure, a lawsuit, or poor management that could drastically drop the stock price. In a liquidation-only scenario, you can’t buy more shares to average down your cost basis or rebalance if one stock plummets. An ETF mitigates this risk by spreading it out.

Built-in Risk Management: With no ability to make new purchases or rebalance actively, the inherent diversification of an ETF acts as a protective shield against volatility. Your portfolio is more resilient to market shocks.

Liquidity and Trading: Most major ETFs are highly liquid and can be easily sold on exchanges, just like individual stocks, ensuring you can liquidate when needed.

Why Individual Stocks Are Riskier in This Scenario

Concentration Risk: If your portfolio only holds a few individual stocks, the failure of just one company could permanently impair a significant portion of your capital, with no way to recover that loss through future investments.

No Rebalancing Capability: In a normal portfolio, you would sell overperforming assets and buy underperforming ones to maintain your target allocation. A liquidation-only scenario prevents you from buying, making it impossible to rebalance. An ETF, while not rebalanced by you, is managed by the fund manager to track its underlying index or strategy, providing consistent exposure over time.

Conclusion

For a portfolio that cannot make new purchases, the priority shifts to capital preservation and risk mitigation. The diversification and risk-spreading properties of ETFs make them a superior and safer choice for maintaining value until liquidation.”

Seems like pretty good advice. I’m 74, it might just be good advice in general.

My point is that you need to be very careful before emigrating. You don’t want any surprises that you can’t manage. At the same time, I should add that some of the investment dealers will close your cash accounts, period. So if you have a portfolio of stocks in a non-registered account, you will, in some instances, be forced to liquidate them. It will not generate any additional tax because of the Canadian departure tax on emigration. But it will mean you will need to buy back your portfolio in your new country, and there may be impediments to doing so. This is really messy, and you need to be very careful.

Another matter is making sure you have a Power of Attorney in place so that you can have things done for you when you have left the country. In the absence of this, you may be forced to return to Canada to take care of this kind of stuff.

The same applies to your bank accounts. Check and double-check what happens.

One maddening aspect of this is the refusal of any of the banks to put anything in writing. No matter who I spoke to, nothing in writing on this topic. Maddening.